Most people who run their own business or manage a team have a rough sense that admin takes up too much time. But “too much” tends to stay vague, a background hum of frustration rather than anything properly examined. That’s the problem. Vague problems accumulate quietly until you realise it’s Thursday afternoon, you’ve answered thirty-seven emails, and you’ve still not done the thing you actually needed to do this week.
So let’s get specific. When you genuinely sit down and track the distribution of your working hours, the numbers can be truly unsettling.
Research from organisations like McKinsey and various HR analytics firms consistently suggests that knowledge workers spend somewhere between 20% and 40% of their working week on tasks that are, at best, administrative in nature ; scheduling, data entry, status updates, chasing approvals, formatting reports, and copying information between systems. That’s one to two full days a week, every week, for most professionals.
For small business owners and solo operators, the figure often skews higher. You’re not just doing the skilled work that generates revenue; you’re also doing the invoicing, the follow-up emails, the spreadsheet tidying, the calendar juggling, and the fifteen-minute job of updating something that should update itself automatically but doesn’t because nobody ever got round to setting it up properly.
None of these tasks feel enormous in the moment. That’s precisely what makes them so effective at consuming time. You don’t notice a slow leak until you’re standing in an inch of water.
This is where it’s worth being precise, because not everything that feels like admin is actually automatable. Responding to a client who has a complex, nuanced concern requires judgement. Writing a proposal that’s tailored to a specific situation requires thought. These are not tasks to hand off to a system.
But a large category of administrative work is essentially rule-based. It follows a predictable pattern, involves moving information from one place to another, or requires sending the same type of message with minor variations. These are the tasks worth scrutinising.
Consider the following, and think honestly about how much time you spend on each:
Each one of these, on its own, might take fifteen to thirty minutes. Across a week, they compound. Across a year, they become weeks of working time spent on low-value processes rather than high-value thinking.
There’s a temptation to frame this purely as an efficiency argument ; if you automate the admin, you’ll have more hours available. That’s true, but it undersells the actual cost of doing this work manually, which is cognitive and not merely temporal.
Every time you switch from meaningful work to a routine admin task, you pay a switching cost. Research on cognitive load suggests it can take twenty minutes or more to return to a state of deep focus after an interruption. When your day is punctuated by small admin tasks ; even ones you complete quickly ; you’re not just losing the minutes they take; you’re losing the focused work time that gets fragmented around them.
There’s also the energy dimension. Admin isn’t neutral. After a long morning of chasing invoices, responding to routine queries and wrestling with spreadsheets, most people find they have considerably less capacity for the harder, more creative work. You’ve technically been busy all day, but you arrive at the important tasks running on half a tank.
The honest answer is usually one of three things: they don’t know what’s possible, they don’t think they have time to set it up, or they’ve tried before and found it more complicated than expected.
The first objection is becoming less valid by the month. Tools like Zapier, Make, and now a wave of AI-assisted platforms have dramatically lowered the barrier to automating routine processes. You don’t need a developer; in many cases you don’t even need particularly advanced technical knowledge. The ecosystem has matured considerably.
The second objection ; not having time to set it up ; is the most ironic and arguably the most worth challenging. If a task takes you thirty minutes a week and takes three hours to automate properly, it pays for itself within six weeks. Over a year, you’ve effectively bought back twenty-six hours. That’s a reasonable trade by almost any measure.
The third objection deserves more sympathy. There’s a real phenomenon where people spend significant time attempting to automate something, discover it doesn’t quite work as expected, patch it together manually anyway, and then feel vaguely defeated. The solution here isn’t to give up on automation; it’s to approach it more methodically ; starting with the highest-frequency, lowest-complexity tasks first, and building confidence before tackling more involved processes.
The most useful exercise is also the simplest one: spend one week keeping a rough log of every task you complete that takes less than thirty minutes and doesn’t require significant judgement. Don’t overthink it; a note on your phone or a running list in a notebook is enough. At the end of the week, go through it and ask: which of these am I doing repeatedly, and which of these is essentially the same task each time?
Those are your automation candidates. From there, you can start researching whether a specific tool handles that task or whether a simple workflow ; automated email sequences, connected apps, a template-driven document system ; could take it off your plate entirely.
It won’t all be automatable. Some tasks will turn out to be more bespoke than they first appeared. But a surprising proportion of them won’t be. And removing even three or four recurring tasks from your weekly workload can materially change how a week feels ; and what you’re able to produce within it.
There’s a broader point underneath all of this. The way most people manage their working week has been assembled gradually and somewhat haphazardly ; systems inherited from previous jobs, tools added because someone recommended them, habits formed under time pressure and never revised. Very few people have sat down and deliberately designed how they work.
Automation isn’t just a productivity technique. It’s an invitation to look clearly at how your time is actually being spent and to decide whether that reflects what you actually value ; or whether it’s just what you fell into. That’s a more interesting question than it might initially appear, and probably worth more than a few minutes of honest consideration.
If you would like any guidence on how to move your business forward, G&G has the necessary skillset to help you manage your business more efficiently and more profitably. if you would like some assistance, please dont hesitate to contact us.
From business planning or Business Administration to assisting with your organisations growth, we are happy to advise and help where we can. Get in touch to start your no-obligation consultation!
Share this article:
